The office bearers of APAGE held a business meeting on 7th December 2008 in Xiamen, China. The aim of this meeting was to draw up a strategic plan for APAGE.
The meeting was attended by:
Professor Shu-Dong Xiao, President
Professor Khean-Lee Goh, Vice President
Professor Shiu-Kum Lam, Past President
Professor Kwong-Ming Fock, Immediate Past President
Professor Kentaro Sugano, Secretary-General
Associate Professor Choon-Jin Ooi, Treasurer
Professor Dai-Ming Fan, Chairman, International Liaison Committee
Professor Kai-Chun Wu, Chairman, Awards Committee
Professor Peter Gibson, Chairman, Education & Research Committee
The following extended their apologies:
Professor Jae-Bock Chung, Chairman, Programme Advisory Committee
Professor Jin-Ho Kim, Chairman, Ethics Committee
Professor Geoffrey Farrell, Representative JGH Foundation
Background Information
The meeting started with Professor Khean-Lee Goh giving some background information on the formation of APAGE. The formation of an Asian Association of Gastroenterology (AAG) was mooted in Tokyo, Japan in 1961 and conceptualized in 1964. The first meeting was held in 1972. The name of the AAG was changed and restructured to Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology in 2000 and the APDW was first held in 2001. With the democratization of the APAGE, the APDW Presidency was delinked from the Congress Presidency. APAGE was incorporated in Hong Kong under the Companies Ordinance on 15th June 2001.
Vision and Mission
Professor Shiu-Kum Lam then addressed the meeting. He spoke of the vision and mission for gastroenterology in Asia and asked APAGE to plan and carry out its role in terms of education, research and as a leading professional body.
Incorporation of APAGE
Professor Kwong-Ming Fock added that the move to incorporate APAGE was started in 2000 and it was officially registered on 15th June 2001 under the Companies Ordinance. It is a company limited by guarantee and not having a share capital. The objects of APAGE are laid down in the Memorandum and Articles of the Association. The mission statement is to make the Asian Pacific region excels in education and research in all aspects of gastroenterology, thereby bringing to the region the highest quality of healthcare in this field of medicine. The stake holders are the member societies, the public as well as the public authorities. The APAGE has developed guidelines which are called Asia Pacific guidelines on Helicobacteri pylori, GERD and Gastric Cancer and he proposed that these be named as APAGE guidelines.
Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
The meeting discussed about the Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and its relation to APAGE, the support from the JGH Trust for activities of the APAGE such as the Young Investigators’ Award, APAGE/JGH Training Fellowship and some Asia Pacific Guidelines. The JGH contributes a sum of USD10,000 (with an equal contribution from APAGE) for the APAGE/JGH Travelling Fellowship.
Representation of National Societies
Professor Kentaro Sugano highlighted that the APAGE could learn from the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology which is well organized and run in terms of publication, supporting research and fellowship programme, etc. APAGE has 19 national societies and only 15 of these are fairly active. It was suggested that informal discussions could be held with gastroenterologists in the countries which have yet to join APAGE to find out their views and whether they would be interested in joining APAGE.
Role of APAGE in APDW
The meeting noted that the APAGE used to be the principal organizer of the APDW but its role has been diminished with the setting up of the APDW Steering Committee. The Committee now plays a major role in advising the organization and the running of the APDWs. Each of the four component societies nominates three representatives to the Committee.
Organisation of Monothematic Meetings
Council discussed at length the possibility of the APAGE organizing monothematic meetings possibly with the national societies apart from the holding of the APDW. Some office bearers felt that it might be difficult to organise if there are too many meetings. The meeting noted that some of the meetings held in the Asia Pacific region are not and do not necessarily come under the auspices of APAGE. Also APAGE might have to provide financial assistance. It was suggested that a business model be developed whereby if the APAGE were to provide the seed money for the meeting, then the APAGE should have a share in the event of a surplus. If the APAGE is just involved in the organization of the meeting, then the APAGE does not want to take a share of the profit. Another suggestion was to split these meetings into focus meetings. The important aim would be how to make the APAGE relevant and how to engage the stake holders in holding these meetings.
APAGE Website
The meeting decided to revamp and rebrand the website to make it more interactive and the APAGE more relevant to the national societies. If the website is popular, it could generate revenue from advertisers.
(Postscript: A new website master has been commissioned and the website has been revamped. Members are requested to visit the website (www.apage.org) to give their feedback and comments).
Consensus Groups and Consensus Development
A suggestion was made that some of the Asia Pacific Consensus could come under the auspices of the APAGE and be rebranded as APAGE Consensus. This could be done by notifying and obtaining the agreement of the expert group who were involved in developing the consensus. The meeting discussed the incentives which the APAGE could provide to the convenors which could be as follows:
- APAGE would provide a forum for the development of the consensus and to provide the expert group with the platform to publish in the JGH
- financial support – it was suggested that APAGE could provide an amount of up to USD15,000 per consensus with an equal amount from the JGH Trust.
The meeting also discussed the financial possibilities of how the consensus development could be funded. One possibility is to ask the biomedical industry to provide unconditional grants to APAGE and APAGE would undertake to finance the development of the consensus.
Conclusion
This strategic planning business meeting was held over one whole day. It was a beneficial and useful meeting with many issues discussed and debated on. The Councillors would have to act and carry out the plans and courses of action which were proposed.
|